What the statute does if you do nothing
For a limited liability company, the statutory default on a member's death is unforgiving in a specific way. The member is dissociated automatically. What passes to the estate is a transferable interest: the right to receive the distributions the deceased would have received, with no vote, no management role and no general right to see the company's records.
So your family is left holding an asset they cannot sell, cannot control, cannot value easily, and cannot force anyone to buy — while the surviving owners decide when, and whether, distributions are made. Nobody chooses that outcome. It is what arrives when nobody chose.
The rule exists for a good reason: it stops a closely held business acquiring a co-owner it never agreed to. You relied on that protection when you thought about your co-owner's family. The point of succession planning is to keep the protection and remove the unfairness.
The sentence that makes planning possible
The statutes say plainly that the operating agreement governs relations among the members, and that the statute applies only to the extent the agreement does not. Arizona puts it in the strongest form there is: where the agreement and the chapter conflict, the agreement governs.Source 1Source 2
This is why every conversation about business succession begins with the operating agreement rather than with the will. A will can only dispose of what you own. It cannot give your family rights inside a company that the company's own agreement withholds from them.Source 1
There are limits — each statute lists provisions an operating agreement may not vary — but the matters that decide what happens to a deceased owner's interest are not among them. This is a decision the owners are allowed to make, and most never do.
The decisions worth making now
- Does the interest get bought, or inherited? A buy-sell provision obliges the company or the surviving owners to purchase a deceased owner's interest, and obliges the estate to sell. It converts an unsellable minority stake into a claim for cash, which is usually what a family actually needs. The alternative — the family stays in as owners — can be right where they work in the business and wrong where they do not.
- At what price? Decide the valuation method now, in writing: a formula, a stated multiple, a periodic agreed value, or an appraisal process with a named tie-breaker. Leaving it to be negotiated later means negotiating it at the worst moment, between a grieving family and a business under strain.
- With what money? A buy-sell obligation nobody can fund is a promise to litigate. Life insurance on each owner's life, owned either by the company or cross-owned by the others, is the ordinary answer. Review the amount as the business grows, because a policy sized to a business ten years ago is now a fraction of the obligation.
- What about incapacity, not just death? A stroke or a dementia diagnosis takes an owner out of the business without triggering any death provision. Agreements that address death and ignore disability leave the harder case unhandled.
- Who runs it on the Monday? Succession of ownership is not succession of management. Name who has authority to sign, to pay staff, to deal with the bank — and make sure the bank knows before it needs to.
- Does the family know what you have decided? An agreement your executor cannot find does not operate. Keep a copy with the estate documents and tell the person who will have to use it that it exists.
If you are a sole owner the questions change but do not disappear: the business has no co-owner to buy it, so the realistic outcomes are sale, transfer to someone in the family who can actually run it, or an orderly wind-down. Deciding which, and writing down what a successor would need to know, is the whole of the planning.
If it is not an LLC
Most of this page is about limited liability companies, because most small businesses are one. Partnerships and corporations behave differently at a death, and in opposite directions.
Partnerships
A partner's death does not dissolve the partnership. Under the uniform act most states have adopted, it dissociates the partner — and the partnership is then obliged to buy the interest out. The same section treats the appointment of a guardian or conservator, and a judicial finding that a partner can no longer perform their duties, exactly as it treats death. A partnership interest can be lost to incapacity as completely as to death, sometimes through a conservatorship the family sought themselves.
The price is statutory rather than negotiable, and the formula is the thing to read before arguing about value. It is the greater of liquidation value and going-concern value — but the going concern is valued without the continuing services of any of the partners. A business whose worth was its founder is priced as a business without its founder. There is also a deadline: where no agreement is reached within a hundred and twenty days of a written demand for payment, the partnership must pay its own estimate in cash.
That makes the written demand the single most useful thing an estate can send. Until one is made, nothing is running.
Corporations
Shares pass to the estate and then to whoever inherits them, subject to any restriction on transfer. The restriction is where succession actually happens in a closely held company — a right of first refusal to the corporation or the other shareholders, an obligation on the company to buy, or a requirement that a transfer be approved.
A restriction binds only if its existence is noted conspicuously on the front or back of the certificate, or is in the statutory information statement. Where it is not, it is unenforceable against somebody without knowledge of it — so a buy-sell agreement in a drawer does not bind an heir whose share certificate says nothing. Check the certificate, not only the agreement.
A restriction also does not reach shares issued before it was adopted, unless the holders were party to it or voted for it. In a company where shares were issued over many years, different blocks can be subject to different rules.
Source 9Source 10Source 11Not sure which of these is yours?
Prefer a guided path?
Answer a few questions and build a personalized Handbook around your situation.
Sahvelo gives information drawn from statutes, agency guidance and official forms. It is not legal advice for your particular situation. Terms & disclaimer.
What changes where you live
Whether an agreement can override the default is the question that decides whether any of this is possible.
Does the operating agreement override the statute?
The answer in 4 states
-
Arizona
Yes, in the strongest terms: the operating agreement governs relations among the members, may contain any provision not contrary to law, and where a provision conflicts with the chapter, the agreement governs. The chapter applies only to matters the agreement does not provide for.Source 1 -
California
Yes, and California says so first: the operating agreement governs relations among the members, the manager's rights and duties, the company's activities and how the agreement itself is amended, and the Act governs only what the agreement leaves out. The freedom stops at a real floor — fifteen paragraphs of matters an agreement may not vary, including eliminating the duty of loyalty or care, and fiduciary duties may be modified only in a written agreement with informed consent, which merely assenting to the agreement does not supply.Source 6 -
Florida
Yes. The operating agreement governs relations among the members and the conduct of the company's affairs, and the chapter governs only to the extent the agreement does not otherwise provide, subject to the list of matters an agreement may not address.Source 2 -
New York
New York goes further than the others: it does not merely permit an operating agreement, it requires the members to adopt one, in writing, covering the business, the conduct of its affairs and the rights and responsibilities of members and managers. It may be entered into up to ninety days after the articles of organization are filed. A manager's personal liability may be limited but not for bad faith, intentional misconduct, a knowing violation of law, or a financial advantage they were not entitled to.Source 7
What happens if there is no agreement?
The answer in 4 states
-
Arizona
The chapter governs: death dissociates the member, and the estate holds a transferable interest carrying distributions and no management, vote or records access.Source: A.R.S. §29-3602 (Events causing dissociation) — Arizona State Legislature (opens in a new tab)•Source 3 -
California
The code governs: death dissociates the member, and a transfer entitles the transferee to neither vote nor participate in management nor access company records.Source: California Corporations Code §17706.02 — events causing dissociation of a member (opens in a new tab)•Source 4 -
Florida
The chapter governs, on the same pattern — and the company need not honor a transferee's rights until it knows or has notice of the transfer.Source: Fla. Stat. §605.0602 (Events causing dissociation) — The Florida Senate (opens in a new tab)•Source 5 -
New York
The estate is better placed here than in most states. The executor, administrator or other legal representative may exercise all of the member's rights for the purpose of settling the estate — including any power the operating agreement gives an assignee to become a member. The grant is purposive rather than general: it is for settling the estate, not for running the business indefinitely.Source 8
Sahvelo has read all four of these states at their own sources. Another state's rule may differ, and we would rather say that than generalize.
Questions people ask about this
-
My will leaves my share of the company to my wife. Isn't that enough?
It disposes of the asset and it cannot create rights inside the company. A will passes what you own; what you own, on the statutory default, is an economic interest. Your wife will receive the distributions you would have received and will not have a vote, a management role or a right to the books — unless the operating agreement gives her those, or obliges the others to buy her out. The document that decides that is the operating agreement, and it is signed by your co-owners rather than by you alone.Source 1Source 2 -
We started the business between friends and never wrote anything down.
Then the statute is your agreement, and it produces the outcome described at the top of this page for whichever of you dies first. This is a frequent position and the easiest to fix while everyone is well and nobody knows whose family will need it. The conversation is easier now than it will ever be again, precisely because it is symmetrical: nobody is negotiating for their own family's advantage when nobody knows who goes first.Source 1 -
We agreed the survivors would buy out the family. Where does the money come from?
That is the question that turns a good agreement into a real one. The ordinary answer is life insurance on each owner's life — held by the company, or cross-owned by the other owners — sized to the buy-out obligation and reviewed as the business grows. An unfunded obligation is a promise to litigate: the survivors cannot pay, the family cannot wait, and the business is the only asset either side can reach.Source 2 -
I own the whole thing myself. What is there to plan?
The same decision without a counterparty. There is nobody to buy your interest, so the realistic outcomes are a sale, a transfer to someone who can actually run it, or an orderly wind-down — and which one happens is decided by how prepared your executor is. Write down what a successor would need on day one: who the key customers and suppliers are, where the accounts and passwords live, who can sign, what the payroll obligations are, and who to call. That document is worth more to your family than any valuation. -
It is a partnership, not an LLC. Does it end when he dies?
Usually not. Under the uniform partnership act most states have adopted, death dissociates the partner rather than dissolving the partnership, and the partnership must then buy the interest out. The price is set by statute — the greater of liquidation value and going-concern value, with the going concern valued without the continuing services of any of the partners — and a written demand for payment starts a hundred-and-twenty-day clock after which the partnership must pay its own estimate in cash.Source 9Source 10 -
There is a shareholders' agreement but nothing on the share certificate.
Then the restriction may not bind. A transfer restriction is enforceable against a holder or a transferee only if its existence is noted conspicuously on the certificate or contained in the statutory information statement; otherwise it is not enforceable against somebody without knowledge of it. This cuts both ways — it may free an heir from a buy-out they did not want, or leave a company unable to keep shares out of the wrong hands. Read the certificate as well as the agreement.Source 11
Official links you'll need
Every link goes directly to the issuing agency or the official tool, and opens in a new tab.
Where this sits in the process
Related
- Business intereststhe same statutes seen from the other end, once it is too late to change them
- Life insurancea buy-sell obligation is ordinarily funded by insurance on each owner's life
- Wills and truststhe will disposes of the asset; the operating agreement decides what the asset is
- Power of attorneyincapacity takes an owner out of a business without triggering any death provision
- Account inventorya successor needs the accounts, the signatories and the passwords before anything else
Sources
The provisions that give an operating agreement primacy over the statutory default, plus the default itself.
-
Arizona: the operating agreement governs, and prevails over the chapter where they conflict.
-
Florida: the operating agreement governs relations among members; the chapter fills the gaps.
-
A.R.S. §29-3502 (Transfer of transferable interest) — Arizona State Legislature (opens in a new tab)
What the default leaves an estate holding, in Arizona.
-
California Corporations Code §17705.02 — transfer of transferable interest (opens in a new tab)
What the default leaves an estate holding, in California.
-
Fla. Stat. §605.0502 (Transfer of transferable interest) — The Florida Senate (opens in a new tab)
What the default leaves an estate holding, in Florida, and the notice requirement.
-
Cal. Corp. Code §17701.10 (Operating agreement; matters governed; limitations) (opens in a new tab)
California's override provision, and the non-waivable floor beneath it.
-
N.Y. Limited Liability Company Law §417 (Operating agreement) (opens in a new tab)
New York's requirement that the operating agreement exist, in writing.
-
What a New York executor may do with a deceased member's rights.
-
A.R.S. § 29-1051 (Events causing partner's dissociation) (opens in a new tab)
That death dissociates a partner rather than dissolving the partnership — as do guardianship and incapacity.
-
A.R.S. § 29-1061 (Purchase of dissociated partner's interest) (opens in a new tab)
The statutory buyout price, valued without the continuing services of any partner, and the 120-day demand clock.
-
A.R.S. § 10-627 (Restriction on transfer of shares and other securities) (opens in a new tab)
That a share transfer restriction binds only where it is noted conspicuously on the certificate.
Sources last reviewed 2026-08-20. Where a source is marked pending re-verification, the page says so wherever the claim appears.