What a trust needs to exist

Almost every state has adopted the Uniform Trust Code's requirements, and where they have, the list is the same to the word. Arizona, Illinois, Ohio and Virginia all say a trust is created only if all five hold.

  1. The settlor has capacity to create a trust.
  2. The settlor indicates an intention to create it.
  3. It has a definite beneficiary — or is a charitable trust, a trust for the care of an animal, or a trust for a non-charitable purpose.
  4. The trustee has duties to perform.
  5. The same person is not the sole trustee and the sole beneficiary.

Nothing on that list is money. Ohio makes the consequence explicit: a trust is valid regardless of the existence, size, or character of the corpus of the trust. A trust with nothing in it is a real trust that controls nothing, which is a frequent failure in an otherwise finished plan.

The fifth requirement worries people who intend to be their own trustee and their own beneficiary, which is the ordinary shape of a revocable living trust. It should not: naming a successor beneficiary satisfies it. Ohio removes the objection in terms, providing that such a trust is not invalid where one or more other persons hold a vested, contingent, or expectant interest, and that no merger of the legal and equitable titles occurs.

Source 4Source 1Source 3Source 5

Why the document is the easy half

A trust controls what it owns. Until the deed to the house has been re-recorded in the trust's name and the accounts retitled, everything is still owned personally, and everything still passes the way it would have without the trust — which usually means probate, the thing the trust was made to avoid.

Signing the trustFunding the trust

One afternoon with a lawyer, and it is the part that gets done. The other is weeks of paperwork with a county recorder and every institution holding an account, and it is the part that does not.

A valid trustA working trust

Validity is the five requirements and needs no assets at all. Working means the trust owns the things it is supposed to control. A plan can be entirely valid and do nothing.

A pour-over will catches what was missedA pour-over will avoids probate

It catches it by sending it through probate first and into the trust afterwards. It is a safety net, not a substitute for funding, and relying on it produces the delay and the public filing the trust was bought to prevent.

The gap is rarely deliberate. It opens because funding is a list of separate errands with no deadline attached to any of them, and because accounts opened after the trust was signed are opened in a personal name by default.

How each kind of asset is actually moved

Three different mechanisms, and using the wrong one is where the expensive mistakes are. Nothing here is instant and none of it happens by mentioning the asset in the trust document.

What moves how
AssetHow it movesWhat to watch
A house or other real propertyA new deed naming the trust as owner, signed, notarized and recorded with the countyCheck the mortgage and any property-tax exemption or assessment cap before recording. A transfer to your own revocable trust is normally protected from a due-on-sale clause, and an exemption may need a re-application.
Bank and brokerage accountsThe institution's own retitling paperwork, usually with a certificate of trustThe trust has to be named exactly as its own document names it, including the date. "My trust" is a form an institution can refuse.
A vehicleA title transfer at the state's motor vehicle agency, where the state allows a trust to hold titleSome states do not, and some charge a transfer fee. Several allow a beneficiary on the title instead, which reaches the same result with one form.
Life insurance and annuitiesA beneficiary designation naming the trust — not a retitlingNaming a trust where a spouse would have had better treatment is a real cost. This is a decision, not a default.
A business interestAn assignment, and usually the operating agreement's own consent procedureThe operating agreement may restrict transfers, including to a trust. Read it before signing anything.
Retirement accountsNothing. They stay in the individual's name.Retitling an IRA or a 401(k) is treated as taking the money out of it and taxed accordingly. Where the trust should benefit, it is named as beneficiary, which is a separate decision with its own consequences.

What to have in front of you before you start

  • The trust document, so the exact name and the date can be copied rather than remembered.
  • A certificate of trust — the short document that proves the trust exists and what the trustee may do, without handing an institution the whole thing.
  • The recorded deed for any property, showing how it is currently titled.
  • A list of every account, policy and plan, and how each one is held today.
  • A note of what is deliberately staying outside, and why — so the next person does not read it as an oversight.

What stays outside on purpose

Not everything belongs in a trust, and a plan that moves everything is as wrong as one that moves nothing. Three categories are usually left out deliberately.

  • Retirement accounts, because retitling one is a taxable distribution. Where the trust should benefit, it is named as beneficiary instead — a decision with real tax consequences either way.
  • A day-to-day current account, because the friction of running ordinary spending through a trust account outweighs avoiding probate on a small balance that a beneficiary designation can handle anyway.
  • Anything already passing outside probate by another route — a joint tenancy with survivorship, a transfer-on-death deed, a payable-on-death account. Moving these into a trust changes who inherits, which is sometimes the intention and is often an accident.

Where an asset is left outside, the beneficiary designation on it becomes the operative instruction and it overrides the trust. A form completed at a job in 1998 outranks a trust signed last year.

When the person can no longer sign

The first requirement is capacity in the settlor, which raises the question a family asks at exactly the wrong moment: can somebody set a trust up for a parent who can no longer do it themselves? The four states Sahvelo has read answer it in four different ways, and the difference is not a detail — in one of them the answer depends on what a power of attorney signed years earlier happens to say.

Wherever the answer runs through a power of attorney, the power has to authorize it before capacity is lost. That is a document to check now rather than a route to rely on later.

What this costs, and when a lawyer is the answer

Sahvelo does not draft documents and does not sell them. What is worth saying is where the money actually goes and which situations are not do-it-yourself, both of which are judgment rather than law.

  • The drafting is a fixed, one-off cost. The funding is mostly free — a recording fee at the county, and paperwork at each institution — and mostly your own time.
  • A trust bought and never funded costs the full price and delivers nothing, which makes funding the highest-return hour in the whole exercise.
  • Get help where a beneficiary receives means-tested benefits, where there is property in more than one state, where a business interest is involved, where a blended family means the trust has to hold competing claims, or where the estate is large enough for federal estate tax to be live.

If a trust already exists and nobody is sure what is in it, that is the thing to establish first. It is answerable in an afternoon from the deed, the account statements and the trust document, and it decides whether anything else needs doing at all.

Not sure which of these is yours?

Sahvelo answers from what it has verified, and asks when it needs one more fact.

Prefer a guided path?

Answer a few questions and build a personalized Handbook around your situation.

What changes where you live

One question, four answers, and the route differs more than the requirements do.

Can a trust be created for somebody who cannot sign?

The answer in 4 states
  • Arizona

    Through a court, not through a power of attorney. § 14-10402 requires capacity in the settlor and excepts one section — § 14-5409 — which lets a court, without appointing a conservator, authorize or ratify arrangements for a protected person, expressly including the establishment of a suitable trust. The court has to consider creditors and dependants first, and may appoint a special conservator to carry it out.Source 1Source 2
  • Illinois

    Illinois changes the actor rather than adding a route. Its requirements test capacity and intention in "the settlor or other person creating the trust" — a phrase that appears nowhere in the Arizona, Ohio or Virginia versions. It is broader than an agent provision and says nothing about where that person's authority comes from, so the authority has to be found elsewhere.Source 3
  • Ohio

    By an agent under a power of attorney, and Ohio goes furthest: the agent may create a trust for the principal whether or not the principal has capacity or indicates an intention. The trade is that the agent is bound to the power of attorney statute's own limits on creating trusts and on gifts, and to a duty to attempt to preserve the principal's existing estate plan.Source 4
  • Virginia

    By an agent, but only where the power of attorney expressly authorizes the agent to create a trust on the settlor's behalf. The word is "expressly": a general power, however wide, does not do it. That makes this a drafting decision taken while the principal can still sign, not a decision available afterwards.Source 5

Sahvelo has read all four of these states at their own sources. Another state's rule may differ, and we would rather say that than generalize.

Questions people ask about this

  • Do I actually need a trust?

    Most estates do not. The facts that usually make one worth the cost are property in more than one state, a beneficiary who cannot manage money or receives means-tested benefits, a wish to control when and how somebody inherits rather than simply that they do, and a preference for privacy — a will becomes a public court record and a trust generally does not. Avoiding probate is a reason, and it is worth weighing against how simple probate actually is where you live.
  • We signed a trust years ago and never moved anything into it. Is it void?

    No. It is a valid trust that owns nothing. Ohio states the principle in terms — a trust is valid regardless of the existence, size, or character of its corpus — and the practical consequence is that the trust controls nothing until assets are retitled into it. The fix is the funding work, and it can be done at any time.Source 4
  • Can I be my own trustee and my own beneficiary?

    Yes, and that is the ordinary shape of a revocable living trust. The requirement is only that the same person is not the sole trustee and the sole beneficiary, which naming a successor beneficiary satisfies. Ohio removes the doubt expressly, providing that such a trust is not invalid where somebody else holds a vested, contingent or expectant interest and that no merger of legal and equitable title occurs.Source 4
  • Will moving the house into a trust trigger the mortgage?

    A transfer into the borrower's own living trust, where they remain a beneficiary and the occupancy does not change, is one of the transfers a lender may not use to accelerate a loan under federal law. Tell the servicer anyway and keep the letter, and check the property-tax position separately — an exemption or an assessment cap may need re-applying even where the mortgage is untouched.
  • Should the retirement accounts go in?

    They are not retitled. Retitling an IRA or a 401(k) is treated as taking the money out of it and taxed accordingly. Where a trust should benefit, it is named as beneficiary instead, and that is a decision with real tax consequences in both directions — a person named directly usually has options a trust does not.
  • What happens to things bought after the trust was funded?

    They are outside it unless they were bought in the trust's name, which is easy to forget for an account opened later. This is the reason funding is a habit rather than an event, and the reason a plan is worth re-reading when anything substantial is bought or sold.

Related from the Sahvelo Journal: What Your Will Doesn’t Decide (opens in a new tab)

Where this sits in the process

Related

Sources

Creation is statutory and nearly uniform; the divergence is in who may create a trust for somebody who cannot. Four states are read at their own codes.

  1. A.R.S. § 14-10402 (Requirements for creation) (opens in a new tab)

    Arizona's five requirements, and that the only exception is a court one.

    azleg.gov Checked 2026-08-20

  2. A.R.S. § 14-5409 (Protective arrangements and single transactions authorized) (opens in a new tab)

    The Arizona court route to establishing a trust without appointing a conservator.

    azleg.gov Checked 2026-08-20

  3. 760 ILCS 3/402 (Requirements for creation) (opens in a new tab)

    Illinois testing capacity and intention in the settlor or other person creating the trust.

    ilga.gov Checked 2026-08-20

  4. Ohio R.C. 5804.02 (General requirements for creation of trust) (opens in a new tab)

    Ohio on the corpus, on merger, and on an agent creating a trust despite incapacity.

    codes.ohio.gov Checked 2026-08-20

  5. Va. Code § 64.2-720 (Requirements for creation) (opens in a new tab)

    Virginia requiring the power of attorney to authorize trust creation expressly.

    law.lis.virginia.gov Checked 2026-08-20

Sources last reviewed 2026-08-20. Where a source is marked pending re-verification, the page says so wherever the claim appears.

The five requirements and the capacity routes are quoted from each state's own code. Everything about funding is procedural rather than statutory — it is how institutions and county recorders actually work, not a rule any of them publishes — and it is marked as such rather than dressed up as law.