What changes the day you marry

Nobody signs anything for this to happen. A marriage is a legal relationship, and the law attaches consequences to it whether or not the couple has discussed them. Four of those consequences are worth knowing before deciding whether you want to keep them.

  • Property acquired during the marriage gets a character. In a community-property state that character is set by statute and the presumption runs toward shared ownership; in the rest, property is divided on a fairness standard if the marriage ends. Either way, what you own at the end of a marriage is not simply what you brought to it.
  • Separate property has to be proved, not assumed. Where a state presumes that what a couple holds is shared, the spouse claiming an asset was theirs alone carries the burden, and the standard of proof can be a demanding one.
  • Debt exposure changes, but not the way people fear. Marrying somebody does not generally make you personally liable for the loans they already had. What can change is which pot of property a creditor is allowed to reach.
  • A surviving spouse acquires rights in an estate that a will cannot simply remove. Most states give a surviving spouse a claim against the estate regardless of what the will leaves them, and in some a marriage that happens after the will was written gives the new spouse a share on its own.

This is the whole argument for having the conversation, and it does not depend on signing anything. A couple who reads their own state's defaults and decides they are fine has made a real decision. A couple who never looks has also made one, without knowing what it was.

Source 1Source 3Source 10

We are not wealthy. Is this for us?

The stereotype is that a prenup is for people with enough money to worry about losing it. That framing gets the question backwards. The defaults apply to everybody; wealth only changes how much is riding on them. What actually makes the question live is complexity, and complexity is ordinary.

Any one of these makes the question worth an hour

  • One of you owns a home, and the other will be living in it and contributing to the mortgage.
  • One of you is bringing significant debt: student loans, tax debt, a business loan, credit cards.
  • Either of you owns a business, or part of one, or expects to start one.
  • Either of you expects an inheritance, or is already a beneficiary of a family trust.
  • There are children from an earlier relationship, on either side.
  • This is a second or later marriage for either of you.
  • One of you expects to stop working, cut back, or relocate for the other's career.
  • One of you will support the other through school or training, or help build their business.
  • There are retirement accounts on either side with real balances in them.
  • Equity compensation, stock options, royalties or intellectual property are in the picture.
  • Either of you supports a parent or another relative financially.
  • Either of you already has a will or a trust that assumes a particular family shape.
  • One of you owns property in another state, or one of you is not a U.S. citizen.
  • Neither of the above, and you would simply rather decide this together than inherit it.

The last line is not filler. Wanting to decide your own financial arrangement is a sufficient reason on its own, and it is the reason that has nothing to do with how much either of you has.

The other half of an honest answer: plenty of couples read this and conclude that their state's defaults are close enough to what they would have written, and that the cost and the conversation are not worth it. That is a legitimate outcome. This page is not trying to sell you a document.

If one of you dies first

Prenups get discussed as though the only thing they prepare for is a marriage ending badly. The more common event is a marriage ending the ordinary way, and the rights that attach at that point are the ones most couples have never heard of.

A will does not have the last word about a spouse. In most states a surviving spouse can set aside what the will leaves them and claim a statutory share of the estate instead. In New York that right reaches beyond the probate estate: money in a joint account, a payable-on-death designation and a retirement plan are all counted in as testamentary substitutes, which is why leaving a spouse out of the will alone accomplishes very little.

This is where a marital agreement does its clearest work, and where the statutes are most explicit about it. New York permits a spouse to waive that right of election outright, and says the waiver works whether it was signed before the wedding or after it. Colorado goes further in the other direction: its probate code refuses to recognize a waiver of any marital right at all unless it sits inside a premarital or marital agreement that is enforceable under the state's marital-agreements article. Florida's rule about marrying after writing a will is defeated by a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, and doing nothing is not one of the ways out.

What the agreement can doWhat it does not do by itself

The gap between these two columns is where plans quietly fail.

Waive or limit a surviving spouse's statutory claim against the estateChange who a retirement plan pays. The plan pays whoever is on its own form.

The plan administrator is required to follow the plan's documents, not a private agreement it has never seen.

Record what each of you agreed should pass to your own childrenMove any asset. A house still passes by its deed, an account by its beneficiary form.

The agreement says what should happen. Other documents are what make it happen.

Settle expectations between the two of you and, in some states, bind the estateSubstitute for a will. Without one, intestacy decides the rest.

An agreement about what a spouse gives up says nothing about who receives instead.

Commit one of you to maintaining life insurance for the other, or for childrenName the beneficiary. That is done on the insurer's form.

A promise to maintain cover and an actual designation are two different acts.

The retirement account is the one to get right. On a typical employer plan the surviving spouse is the default beneficiary, and naming anybody else takes that spouse's written consent, witnessed by a plan representative or a notary. The statute conditions the consent on the participant's spouse giving it. Two people signing an agreement before the wedding are not yet spouses, and the plan administrator is separately obliged to follow the documents the plan itself holds. Whatever the agreement says, complete the plan's own consent form after the marriage. An ordinary IRA is not governed by those rules, so the same household can get two different answers about two accounts.

Which is the point worth carrying away from this section. A prenup is one document in a system, and the system includes the will, any trust, the deed to the house, every beneficiary designation, the life insurance, and any agreement governing a business interest. When those disagree, the agreement is usually not the one that wins.

Source 7Source 8Source 9Source 10Source 12Source 11Source 13

Not sure which of these is yours?

Sahvelo answers from what it has verified, and asks when it needs one more fact.

Prefer a guided path?

Answer a few questions and build a personalized Handbook around your situation.

What an agreement can and cannot reach

What a premarital agreement may cover is set by each state's own statute, so the honest general answer is a shape rather than a list. Three tiers. Agreements are strongest about property and money between the two people signing. They are more conditional about terms a state regulates in its own right, which is where most of the negotiating actually happens. And they are weakest where somebody who did not sign is affected, or where a third party's rights are involved.

Three tiers, and the reason they differ
Where agreements are strongestWhy
What each of you owned before the marriage, and what happens to itIt is your own property, and the agreement binds only the two of you.
How property acquired during the marriage is characterizedThis is exactly what the default rules decide, and what a statute lets you decide instead.
Claims between the two of you for contributions made during the marriageTexas says so directly: an agreement satisfying the state's requirements can waive or release a reimbursement claim.
What a surviving spouse may claim from the other's estateSeveral states provide expressly for this waiver, and one of them permits it only in this form.
How a business interest is treated, alongside the agreements that govern the businessThe agreement can settle the marital side; the operating or buy-sell agreement governs the business side.
Income earned during the marriage, and what either of you accumulates laterIn a community-property state this is the default that most surprises people: what you earn while married is shared from the moment it is earned. Texas states it plainly, and the agreement is where a couple decides otherwise.
Intellectual property, royalties, licensing income and anything either of you createsTwo questions rather than one: who owns the work, and who owns what it pays. A copyright or a catalog created before the marriage can be separate property while the income it produces during the marriage is not, and an agreement is where that is settled instead of argued.
Appreciation in something one of you already ownedTexas fixes an asset's character by inception of title rather than by who paid afterward, so one asset can be part separate and part community. Growth in a business one of you built is the case this decides.
Terms a state regulates in its own right, where the answer is that state's
The termWhat is actually in question
Spousal support after the marriage endsAgreements commonly address whether either person will support the other, and on what terms. States treat this differently from property: some attach extra conditions to giving it up, and some will review it against circumstances at the time rather than at signing. Sahvelo has read no state's rules on this and does not tell you whether a waiver would hold.
Which state's law governs the agreementCouples with connections to more than one state commonly name one. Naming a state does not settle everything by itself: a court applies its own rules about when it will honor that choice, and the four states read here answer the underlying questions in genuinely different ways. Sahvelo has not read any state's rules on choice-of-law clauses.
Confidentiality about the marriage or its financesSometimes appropriate, and worth thinking about before signing rather than after. The trap is breadth: a clause wide enough to cover anything either of you says can collide with work that depends on speaking publicly, with an obligation to disclose finances elsewhere, or with a later legal proceeding. Whether and how a state enforces one is not read here.
Who keeps a companion animalOrdinary enough to be worth naming. States have not all landed in the same place on whether an animal is simply property in this context, and Sahvelo has not read any of them. What is true regardless is that agreeing it in advance costs nothing and is far easier than agreeing it later.
Where an agreement runs into somebody who did not sign it
The areaWhat actually decides it
A creditor's right to be paidThe creditor was never a party. Allocating a debt between spouses decides who reimburses whom, not who the lender may pursue.
An employer retirement planFederal plan rules and the plan's own documents. The consent is given by a spouse, on the plan's form, after the marriage.
Who a life insurance policy paysThe beneficiary designation on file with the insurer.
Who takes the houseThe deed. A survivorship tenancy or a recorded transfer-on-death instrument operates before any will is read.
Anything concerning a childCustody, parenting time and child support are decided on the child's interests by a court. A child is not a party to their parents' contract, and states commonly provide that a child's right to support cannot be adversely affected by one.

Sahvelo will not tell you that a particular clause is enforceable where you live. Which provisions a state permits, and what it requires before it will enforce them, is set by that state's own statute and its courts, and it is the first thing to establish with counsel there. What is safe to say generally is the direction: the further a term reaches from the two signatures on the page, the less likely it is to do the work on its own.

Source 5Source 3Source 11Source 12

The person who steps back from work

Most writing on this subject is addressed to the person with more to protect. That is half the conversation, and the half that produces bad agreements, because an agreement one person did not really evaluate is both unfair and less likely to survive being tested.

The question a couple should actually put on the table is what happens to the person who contributes in ways that do not show up as their own property. Leaving a job to raise children. Cutting hours. Moving for the other person's career. Supporting a partner through school. Working in a business owned by the other. Caring for a parent. Each of those costs earnings now and compounds into lost retirement savings and lost career position later, and none of it accumulates in the name of the person doing it.

State law already has views on this, which is a good reason to find out what yours says before deciding what to write instead. Texas provides a statutory reimbursement claim where one marital estate confers a benefit on another, and it names using married money to improve the other spouse's real property, and using time, toil, talent or effort to build the value of a spouse's separate estate beyond what managing it required. A spouse who helped grow a business owned before the marriage is describing that provision. And the same chapter says an agreement meeting the state's requirements can waive that claim, which is precisely why the person being asked to sign needs to know it exists.

Texas also excludes something couples assume runs the other way: a court may not recognize a reimbursement claim for a student loan owed by a spouse. Married earnings used to pay down a partner's student debt are not, on the face of that section, a contribution the statute compensates. Which is a reason to address it in the agreement rather than to assume the default is fair.

Questions both of you should be able to answer

  • If one of us stops working or cuts back, how do we account for that when we look at this again?
  • If one of us helps build the other's business, what is that worth and how is it recognized?
  • If married money pays down a debt or improves property that belongs to one of us, is that repaid?
  • What happens if the person who stepped back needs to return to work later at a lower salary?
  • Does the agreement do anything to keep retirement savings from accruing entirely to one of us?
  • Is there anything in here that only makes sense while both of us are earning?
Source 4Source 5

Why starting early matters

There is no national waiting period, and Sahvelo will not invent one. Some states impose a specific requirement about how long before the wedding an agreement must be presented or signed, and some do not. What is worth understanding is why the question exists at all.

An agreement signed under pressure is vulnerable in two directions. It is more likely to be challenged later on the ground that it was not entered into voluntarily, which is a standard states apply in some form. And it is more likely to be a bad agreement on its own terms, because working out what a couple actually wants about a house, a business, an inheritance and a career break takes more than one conversation. A document produced in a week is usually a document nobody read properly.

If the wedding is close and one of you is being told to sign now or the wedding is off, that is not a scheduling problem. Pressure of that kind goes directly to whether the agreement was voluntary, and it is a reason to get independent advice immediately rather than to sign and sort it out later. Nobody at Sahvelo, and no page, can tell you whether a particular agreement would hold up.

On lawyers, the accurate answer is narrower than the common one. It is not true everywhere that each person must have their own attorney. It is true that one lawyer cannot represent two people whose interests differ on the same question, that several states treat independent advice as relevant to whether an agreement is enforced, and that some states attach specific consequences to a particular term when the person giving it up had no lawyer. The practical version: find out what your state requires before deciding to share one.

What to have ready for a first conversation with counsel

  • The wedding date, and the state you will live in afterward.
  • A list of what each of you owns: accounts, retirement balances, real estate, vehicles, business interests.
  • A list of what each of you owes, including student loans, tax debt and anything co-signed.
  • Recent tax returns, and documents for any property either of you owns.
  • Anything about a trust either of you is a beneficiary of, or an inheritance either of you expects.
  • Any existing will, trust, power of attorney or beneficiary designation.
  • Any operating agreement, partnership agreement or buy-sell agreement for a business.
  • The handful of things you have already agreed between yourselves, written down as plainly as you can.

What changes where you live

Four states read at source, and they answer this in genuinely different ways rather than with local variations on one rule. Read yours as your state, and read the others as evidence that the answer travels badly.

What does the state decide on its own, and what does an agreement do about it?

The answer in 4 states
  • Texas

    Texas decides it as property, and the Family Code does most of the work before anybody signs anything. A spouse's separate property is what they owned before the marriage plus what came to them during it by gift, devise or descent; everything else acquired during the marriage is community property. Anything either spouse holds is presumed community, and proving otherwise takes clear and convincing evidence, so the practical burden falls on the person claiming an asset was theirs alone. On debt, marriage does not make you liable for a spouse's obligations: a person is personally liable for a spouse's acts only where the spouse acted as their agent or incurred a debt for necessaries, and the statute closes the obvious argument by providing that marriage alone does not create the agency. What changes is reach. Separate property is not subject to the other spouse's liabilities, and community property under one spouse's sole management is beyond the other spouse's premarital and nontortious debts, but community property that a spouse manages is subject to the debts that spouse incurred before or during the marriage, and all community property is exposed to either spouse's tort liability during the marriage. Texas also creates a reimbursement claim when one marital estate benefits another, expressly including improvements to a spouse's real property and time, toil, talent or effort spent building the value of a spouse's separate estate, while excluding a student loan owed by a spouse. A premarital or marital property agreement meeting the requirements of the Family Code's agreements chapter can waive or release those reimbursement claims. Texas also lets a couple record a subscribed and acknowledged schedule of separate property in the county deed records, which is worth knowing when the point of the exercise is to be able to prove what was separate years later.Source 1Source 2Source 3Source 4Source 5
  • New York

    New York's clearest statutory answer is about death rather than divorce. A surviving spouse has a right of election against the deceased spouse's estate, and it is measured against more than the probate estate: joint accounts, payable-on-death arrangements, revocable transfers and retirement money are counted in as testamentary substitutes, so a will that leaves a spouse nothing does not by itself achieve much. Retirement is treated distinctly. Money under a retirement, pension, deferred compensation or profit-sharing arrangement counts as a testamentary substitute, but for a plan carrying the federal survivor rules it counts only to the extent of half its value. The waiver provision is unusually clean. A spouse may waive or release the right of election during the other's lifetime, and a waiver of all rights in the other's estate operates as a waiver against any will or testamentary provision. The formality is a single requirement: in writing, subscribed by the maker, and acknowledged or proved in the manner New York requires for recording a conveyance of real property. The statute then says what does not matter, and the list answers real questions: the waiver works whether it was executed before or after the marriage, whether it is signed by one spouse or both, and whether or not there was any consideration for it. One provision runs only one way and is worth reading carefully. A federal spousal consent given under the Internal Revenue Code's survivor-benefit sections is deemed to be a waiver for New York purposes against that benefit. Nothing in the section says the reverse, so a New York waiver should not be assumed to supply the consent the federal plan rules require. What is not read here is what New York requires of the wider agreement the waiver usually sits inside, which is governed by the Domestic Relations Law.Source 6Source 7Source 8
  • Colorado

    Colorado answers it as a question of vessel rather than of content, and the answer is in the probate code rather than the family code, which is why reading the will statutes alone never turns it up. Any affirmation, modification or waiver of a marital right or obligation made on or after 1 July 2014 is unenforceable unless it is contained in a premarital or marital agreement that is enforceable under the marital-agreements part of title 14. Three things follow. The agreement is the only permitted form, so a waiver written into a will, a trust or a side letter does not do it. Premarital and marital agreements are named together, so an agreement made after the wedding is capable of the same work as one made before it. And because everything turns on the agreement being enforceable under that article, that article's requirements are effectively the whole question in Colorado. Waivers made before 1 July 2014 are governed by the law in force when they were made. What Sahvelo has not read is title 14 itself, so this page states what the probate code requires of the vessel and states nothing about what the vessel must contain or how it must be executed. That is a statement about Sahvelo's reading rather than about Colorado law, and it is the first thing to establish with counsel there.Source 9
  • Florida

    The Florida provision Sahvelo has read at source is the one that catches couples who marry after their wills were written, and it is a good illustration of a default that operates quietly. Where a person marries after making a will and the spouse survives them, the surviving spouse receives the share they would have taken had there been no will at all. There are three exits and only three: provision was made for the spouse, or the spouse waived it, by prenuptial or postnuptial agreement; the spouse is provided for in the will; or the will discloses an intention not to provide for them. Two features matter for planning. Doing nothing is not one of the exits, so an old will and a new marriage produce a claim by operation of law rather than by anybody's choice. And the statute names prenuptial and postnuptial agreements together, so on this provision an agreement signed after the wedding is as capable of dealing with it as one signed before. Florida's separate elective-share regime and its requirements for premarital agreements generally are not read here, so nothing on this page states them.Source 10

Sahvelo has read all four of these states at their own sources. Another state's rule may differ, and we would rather say that than generalize.

Questions people ask about this

  • Will my prenup override my will?

    They do different jobs and it is a mistake to think of one as beating the other. A will says who receives what. An agreement records what each of you gave up or kept, and in several states it is the instrument that can waive a surviving spouse's statutory claim. New York permits that waiver expressly and asks for one formality: in writing, subscribed, and acknowledged the way a deed is acknowledged for recording. Colorado goes further and refuses to recognize a waiver of a marital right unless it sits inside an enforceable premarital or marital agreement. Neither of those makes the agreement a substitute for a will. Without a will, intestacy still decides who receives the rest.Source 7Source 9
  • Can my spouse still claim part of my estate?

    Usually yes, unless they have given that right up in a way your state recognizes. Most states give a surviving spouse a claim against the estate that the will alone cannot remove, and New York's version reaches past the probate estate to count joint accounts, payable-on-death designations and retirement money as testamentary substitutes. Florida adds a separate trap: marry after making a will, and the new spouse takes an intestate share unless the will provided for them, disclosed an intention not to, or an agreement dealt with it. The route out is not silence in the will. It is a waiver in the form the state requires.Source 6Source 7Source 10
  • What happens to my 401(k)?

    Once you are married, a typical employer plan treats your spouse as the default recipient of the death benefit, and naming anybody else requires that spouse's written consent, acknowledging the effect of the election and witnessed by a plan representative or a notary. Two things follow for a couple with an agreement. The consent the statute describes is given by the participant's spouse, and before the wedding neither of you is that. And a plan administrator is separately required to act in accordance with the plan's own documents, which means the form on file decides, not an agreement the plan has never seen. So sign the plan's own consent form after the marriage, whatever the agreement says. An ordinary IRA is not an employer plan under these rules, so the answer for an IRA can legitimately differ from the answer for the 401(k) it was rolled from.Source 12Source 11Source 13
  • I have children from an earlier marriage. Does a prenup protect what I leave them?

    Partly, and on its own not nearly enough. The agreement is where a new spouse can give up the statutory claim that would otherwise cut across what you leave your children, and in Colorado it is the only instrument that waiver can live in. It moves nothing by itself: the house still passes by its deed, accounts by their beneficiary forms, and a retirement plan by the plan's own paperwork. A second marriage is where those documents most often disagree with each other, and it is worked through in full on the page about coordinating an agreement with the rest of the estate plan.Source 9Source 11
  • Does a prenup affect life insurance beneficiaries?

    Not on its own. An agreement can commit one of you to carrying a policy and keeping it in force, which is a common way to secure a promise made to a spouse or to children from an earlier relationship. Who the insurer actually pays is decided by the beneficiary designation on file. Those are two separate acts, and a promise made in an agreement that was never followed by a change on the insurer's form leaves the money going where the old form says.
  • What do we each have to write down and disclose before signing?

    Financial disclosure is the part of this that is work rather than negotiation, and it is worth doing properly because an agreement rests on it. What a state requires varies and Sahvelo has read no state's rules on it, but the practical list does not: every bank, investment and retirement account with its balance; real estate with what is owed on it; vehicles; business interests and your share of them; equity compensation and options; trusts either of you benefits from and inheritances either of you expects; life insurance; income; every debt including tax debt and anything co-signed; and any high-value personal property such as jewelry, art or collections that either of you is bringing. Make it a schedule specific enough to be evidence years later rather than a summary, because that is the job it has to do. Texas goes one step further and lets a subscribed and acknowledged schedule of separate property be recorded in the county deed records, and notes that such a schedule is not notice to a good-faith purchaser or creditor unless it is recorded in the county where the real property sits.Source 5
  • Can a prenup deal with alimony or spousal support?

    It is one of the things agreements are most often written to address, and it is also the term states are most likely to treat differently from property. Some attach extra conditions before they will enforce a waiver of support, and some will look at whether the result is still fair at the time it is claimed rather than only at the time it was signed. Sahvelo has read no state's rules on this and will not tell you whether a waiver would hold where you live. What is safe to say is that it is a real category, that it is worth deciding deliberately rather than inheriting, and that it is one of the specific things to establish with counsel in the state you will live in.
  • What happens to income, royalties or anything I create after we marry?

    This is where the default rules do the most work and get noticed the least. In a community-property state, what either of you earns during the marriage is shared from the moment it is earned. Texas puts it plainly: separate property is what you owned before the marriage plus what came to you by gift, devise or descent, and everything else acquired during the marriage is community. Creative and intellectual property is two questions rather than one. Who owns the work, and who owns what it pays. A copyright, a catalog, a patent or a trademark created before the marriage can be your separate property while the royalties and licensing income it produces during the marriage are not. The same split applies to a business you already owned: Texas fixes an asset's character by inception of title rather than by who paid afterward, so a single asset can be part separate and part community, and growth in something you built is exactly the case that decides. An agreement is where a couple settles that in advance instead of reconstructing it years later.Source 1Source 2
  • Can we choose which state's law applies?

    Couples with connections to more than one state commonly name one in the agreement, and it is worth understanding what that does and does not settle. Naming a state does not make every question that state's question: a court applies its own rules about when it will honor that choice, and some questions, such as what happens to real property, are decided where the property sits regardless. Colorado shows the sharper version of the problem from the other direction: there, a waiver of a marital right is unenforceable unless it sits inside an agreement enforceable under Colorado's own article. Sahvelo has not read any state's rules on choice-of-law clauses and does not tell you whether yours would be honored. It is one of the first things to raise with counsel if either of you owns property in another state, if you may move, or if one of you is not a U.S. citizen.Source 9
  • Can we put anything we want in it?

    No, and the limit is not a formality. An agreement is a contract, and a state decides which of its terms it will enforce. Texas is explicit that an agreement only does the work of waiving statutory claims where it satisfies that state's own requirements for agreements, so the document is conditioned rather than self-executing. Three kinds of term are worth separating. Property and money between the two of you is the strongest ground. Terms a state regulates in its own right, such as support, choice of law and confidentiality, are real categories on conditions that state sets. And terms about somebody who did not sign, above all a child, are not yours to settle. Provisions about personal conduct, weight, chores or social media turn up in coverage of celebrity agreements and rarely in ordinary ones; their enforceability is uncertain, courts have limited appetite for supervising them, and they consume negotiating attention the financial terms need.Source 5
  • My fiance has a lot of student debt. Am I taking that on?

    Marrying somebody does not generally make you personally liable for what they already owe. Texas states it plainly: a person is personally liable for a spouse's acts only if the spouse acted as their agent or incurred a debt for necessaries, and marriage alone does not make either of you the other's agent. What can change is which property a creditor may reach. In Texas your separate property stays out of it, but community property that you manage is exposed to the debts you incurred, and all community property is exposed to either spouse's tort liability during the marriage. Note also the direction that surprises people: Texas will not recognize a reimbursement claim for a student loan owed by a spouse, so married earnings used to pay a partner's loans are not compensated by that section. An agreement can allocate responsibility between the two of you. It cannot bind a lender who was never a party to it.Source 3Source 4
  • Do I need to update my estate plan after signing a prenup?

    Yes, and the agreement is usually the beginning of that work rather than the end of it. Signing records what the two of you decided; it does not retitle a house, change a beneficiary form, or write a will. The list worth working through after the wedding is short and concrete: the will, any trust, the deed to any real property, every beneficiary designation on retirement and investment accounts, the life insurance, any business agreement, and the spousal consent on an employer retirement plan, which can only be given once you are actually married.
  • We are already married. Is it too late?

    Not necessarily, and two of the four states read here say so on the face of their statutes. New York's waiver of the right of election is effective whether it was executed before or after the marriage. Florida's rule about marrying after making a will names prenuptial and postnuptial agreements together. Colorado's probate code speaks of premarital and marital agreements as one category. What Sahvelo cannot tell you is whether the standard your state applies to an agreement made during a marriage is the same one it applies before, because that is set by each state's own statute and courts and is not read here. It is the first question to ask.Source 7Source 10Source 9
  • We signed one years ago and then moved. Does it still work?

    It is worth a review rather than an assumption. The state you live in now may not be the state whose law the agreement was written for, and the two can differ on what the agreement may cover, what it takes to enforce it, and whether a waiver of a particular right is recognized at all. Colorado is the clearest illustration of why this is not a formality: there a waiver of a marital right is unenforceable unless it sits inside an agreement enforceable under that state's own article. A move is one of the events worth treating as a trigger to re-read the agreement alongside the will, the deed and the beneficiary forms.Source 9
  • Can we settle custody or child support in it?

    No, and this is one of the few places where the general answer is safe. Custody and parenting time are decided on the child's interests at the time the question arises, by a court, and a child is not a party to their parents' contract. States commonly provide that a child's right to support cannot be adversely affected by a premarital agreement. Couples can and do write down their intentions about children; what they cannot do is treat those intentions as settled in the way a property term is settled.
  • My state is not one of the four. What do I do?

    Ask four questions locally, and they are the same four wherever you are. What does this state decide about property acquired during a marriage, and what is the standard for proving something was separate? What claim does a surviving spouse have against an estate here, and what does it take to give it up? What does this state require before it will enforce a premarital agreement, and does that include anything about timing or independent counsel? And does this state treat an agreement made after the wedding by the same standard as one made before? Sahvelo does not assert anything about the states it has not read, and where a state is not listed here, it has not been read.

Where this sits in the process

Related

Sources

Four states read at source, plus the federal retirement rules that sit over all of them.

  1. Texas Family Code §§3.001–3.003 — separate property, community property, and the presumption (opens in a new tab)

    Texas: what is separate, what is community, and the clear-and-convincing burden.

    tcss.legis.texas.gov Checked 2026-08-14

  2. Texas Family Code §§3.005–3.006 — gifts between spouses and the rule of inception of title (opens in a new tab)

    Texas: inception of title, and why one asset can be part separate and part community.

    tcss.legis.texas.gov Checked 2026-08-14

  3. Tex. Fam. Code §§3.201, 3.202 (spousal liability and rules of marital property liability) (opens in a new tab)

    Texas: personal liability for a spouse's debts, and which property a creditor may reach.

    tcss.legis.texas.gov Checked 2026-08-14

  4. Tex. Fam. Code §§3.402, 3.409 (claim for reimbursement; nonreimbursable claims) (opens in a new tab)

    Texas: reimbursement for improvements and for time, toil, talent or effort, and the student-loan exclusion.

    tcss.legis.texas.gov Checked 2026-08-14

  5. Tex. Fam. Code §§3.410, 3.004 (effect of marital property agreements; recordation of separate property) (opens in a new tab)

    Texas: an agreement's effect on reimbursement claims, and the recordable schedule of separate property.

    tcss.legis.texas.gov Checked 2026-08-14

  6. N.Y. EPTL §5-1.1-A — the surviving spouse's right of election (opens in a new tab)

    New York: the elective share, and testamentary substitutes counted into it.

    nysenate.gov Checked 2026-08-13

  7. N.Y. EPTL §5-1.1-A(e) (waiver or release of right of election) (opens in a new tab)

    New York: waiver of the right of election, and the one formality it takes.

    nysenate.gov Checked 2026-08-13

  8. N.Y. EPTL §5-1.1-A(b)(1)(G), (e)(4) (retirement benefits as testamentary substitutes; federal waivers) (opens in a new tab)

    New York: retirement benefits at half value, and the federal consent that counts as a waiver.

    nysenate.gov Checked 2026-08-13

  9. C.R.S. §15-11-213 (waiver of right to elect and of other rights) (opens in a new tab)

    Colorado: a marital right may be waived only inside an enforceable premarital or marital agreement.

    leg.colorado.gov Checked 2026-08-19

  10. Fla. Stat. §732.301 — pretermitted spouse (opens in a new tab)

    Florida: marrying after making a will, and the three exits from the spouse's claim.

    flsenate.gov Checked 2026-08-13

  11. 29 U.S.C. §1104(a)(1)(D) — the duty to act in accordance with plan documents (opens in a new tab)

    Federal: a plan fiduciary must act in accordance with the plan's own documents.

    uscode.house.gov Checked 2026-08-13

  12. 29 U.S.C. §1055 — survivor annuities and the spousal consent requirement (opens in a new tab)

    Federal: the surviving spouse as default beneficiary, and the written, witnessed consent.

    uscode.house.gov Checked 2026-08-13

  13. 29 C.F.R. §2510.3-2(d) — individual retirement accounts excluded from Title I (opens in a new tab)

    Federal: an ordinary IRA is not an ERISA plan, so the same household gets two answers.

    ecfr.gov Checked 2026-08-13

Sources last reviewed 2026-09-09. Where a source is marked pending re-verification, the page says so wherever the claim appears.